The democratization of design

XVI.5 September + October 2009
Page: 40
Digital Citation

PS AND QSResearch automation as technomethodological pixie dust


Authors:
Elizabeth Churchill

Like many people in these times of cost saving, I have lost my sense of humor. Why? Because what constitutes reasonable economizing—determining what costs are or are not optional—reveals some curious assessments of value. I am referring to human-centered research and the peculiar assumption that qualitative research methods—like qualitative interviewing and ethnographically inspired fieldwork—are too expensive to use in the design process during lean times. There are plenty of companies willing to jump in and offer cut-rate services, but, as in all of life, one should be aware that "you get what you pay for." Timothy de Waal Malefyt's…




You must be a member of SIGCHI, a subscriber to ACM's Digital Library, or an interactions subscriber to read the full text of this article.

GET ACCESS

Join ACM SIGCHI

In addition to all of the professional benefits of being a SIGCHI member, members get full access to interactions online content and receive the print version of the magazine bimonthly.


Subscribe to the ACM Digital Library

Get access to all interactions content online and the entire archive of ACM publications dating back to 1954. (Please check with your institution to see if it already has a subscription.)


Subscribe to interactions

Get full access to interactions online content and receive the print version of the magazine bimonthly.


Post Comment


No Comments Found