Features

XXIX.1 January - February 2022
Page: 90
Digital Citation

The German research community within ACM SIGCHI 2010–2020


Authors:
Johannes Schöning

back to top 

The global human-computer interaction (HCI) research community strives for more diversity. This aspiration includes both the diversity of HCI scholars and the diversity of HCI study participants and potential users. Recent work about the HCI research landscape shows a tentatively positive trend toward increased diversity [1,2]. However, these works also highlight that there is still a lot of work to be done to build an inclusive, global HCI research community. We believe the present must be understood to foster change and shape the future. As a first step, here we analyze the German HCI research landscape of the past 10 years with a focus on gender diversity, nationality diversity, and research output at ACM SIGCHI conferences.

ins01.gif

More precisely, this article aims to identify the actors and groups working on HCI topics in Germany over the past decade. We contribute an analysis of the contributions that the German HCI research community made to the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) and other SIGCHI conferences from 2010 to 2020. Furthermore, we outline the knowledge contributions and key HCI researchers of this period. In doing so, we hope to stimulate a discussion and foster reflection on the current German HCI research landscape. We ultimately aim to capture the German research community's evolution in researching HCI topics over the past decade.

back to top  Insights

ins02.gif

The German HCI research community is one of the most active HCI communities in the world, with many contributions to various SIGCHI conferences. This can be seen at websites such as https://www.whatthehci.com/, developed by Kashyap Todi, which captures statistics about papers accepted at the CHI conference, and https://www.germanhci.de, which is rooted in the organization of German HCI events at CHI conferences and provides a platform for HCI research in Germany.

To chart the activities of the German research community within SIGCHI conferences from 2010 to 2020, we took both a quantitative and a qualitative approach. First, we analyzed full-paper contributions published at CHI [3] and other SIGCHI conferences from 2010 to 2020 by research groups and faculty members located in Germany. Then, we identified HCI researchers located in Germany who shaped the field in the country in a variety of ways. We used the list of German SIGCHI Academy members as a starting point to reflect on the knowledge that German HCI scholars produced within the past decade. We discuss the knowledge contributions and the impact of specific HCI scholars on Germany's HCI research landscape in a more qualitative way.

back to top  HCI Research Groups in Germany 2010–2020

We identified HCI research groups in Germany using a multistep approach. First, we created a list of all full universities in Germany. According to the Wissenschaftsrat (the German Council of Science and Humanities, an advisory body to the federal government; https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/2020/8675-20.html), there are 2,600 computer science professors in Germany (data from 2018). About 1,000 work at universities; the remaining 1,600 are employed at universities of applied sciences. Based on this list, we identified all the chairs at full universities in Germany that have a variation of one or more parts of the following terms in the designation of their chairs or research group names: human/people, computer/technology/media, and interaction. Then, we created a table that contained the universities, the chairs/research groups, and designated faculty members. We also identified additional relevant research groups by using whatthehci.com, the ACM Digital Library, and the DBLP. The list includes groups at universities of applied sciences and non-university institutes (e.g., Fraunhofer institutes, Max Planck institutes). Mainly using DBLP, we analyzed whether the identified groups regularly publish at CHI and SIGCHI conferences. Based on the number of published full papers from 2010 to 2020, we identified the first, second, and third venues in terms of publication volume (Figure 1). As a third step, we sent the initial version of this paper and the spreadsheet with the collected data to the researchers identified in our analysis and asked them to check their own data, to let us know if anyone was missing from the spreadsheet, and for general feedback.

ins03.gif Figure 1. Main conferences targeted by the German HCI community from 2010 to 2020. We identified the first, second, and third venues in terms of publication volume.

As this article aims to identify the longer-term actors and groups working on HCI topics in Germany, we analyzed which research groups regularly published in the main proceedings of CHI or contributions at other SIGCHI conferences. We defined actively publishing at CHI as full-paper contributions at CHI in three separate years within the past 10 years. We defined actively publishing at SIGCHI conferences as at least five full-paper contributions at all SIGCHI conferences throughout the past decade. We initially identified 68 HCI working groups established at German universities and other research institutes (see Table 1: http://interactions.acm.org/uploads/CHI_in_Germany.xlsx).


Even though HCI as a research field typically attracts a diverse set of researchers and disciplines, the German HCI community is quite homogeneous.


Our results showed that even though HCI as a research field typically attracts a diverse set of researchers and disciplines, the German HCI community is quite homogeneous and small. Overall, we identified only 68 groups that focus on HCI research, the majority of which are situated in computer science or a related field. Hence, about 5 to 6 percent of all computer science professorships at German universities focus on HCI.

The majority of groups and faculty members (80 percent) are situated in computer science or a closely related field (e.g., business informatics, software engineering). The remaining groups are located in other departments or faculties, such as arts and humanities or psychology. Interestingly, only 49 percent of the groups we identified have regularly published at CHI (n=33). Thirteen additional groups regularly publish at SIGCHI conferences. Thus, about 68 percent of the research groups we identified actively contributed their research to SIGCHI conferences from 2010 to 2020.

Compared with all computer science professors in Germany, the share of female professors in all HCI research groups we identified (n=68) is higher (21 percent compared with 13 percent in computer science), but the number is also only comparable to the share of female professors across all academic subjects in Germany (25 percent in 2018). However, looking at female professors in Germany who regularly published at CHI from 2010 to 2020, the share is far lower (6 percent), thus below the average of female professors in computer science in Germany (13 percent) [4]. If we look only at groups that primarily publish at CHI (Figure 1), then there is just one female researcher in this selection. The female researchers in the German CHI community appear to mainly focus on other SIGCHI conferences such as IUI, MobileHCI, or TEI (Figure 1). Therefore, we see a lot of potential for more diverse participation in the main HCI venue, the CHI conference.

The proportion of international scholars employed at German universities is also quite low. This uneven distribution is reflected in the nationality of researchers in computer science in Germany. Overall, about 5 percent of the computer science professors in Germany are foreigners. Our analysis shows a similar result. Apart from two exceptions (also from a German-speaking country), all HCI research groups are, to the best of our knowledge, led by people with German citizenship. This is in stark contrast to other countries, where the research groups are more diverse.

Looking at the main conference venues, based on the conference contributions, we saw other interesting trends. While CHI is the most prominent main conference among the 46 groups that regularly publish at SIGCHI conferences, MobileHCI and AutomotiveUI are the backbone of the German CHI research community. More than 25 percent of the 33 groups that mainly publish at CHI have those conferences as their second conference theme. TEI and ISS are additional popular conferences for German researchers.

We are aware that such quantitative or bibliographic approaches to evaluate subfields of computer science have their limitations [5]. Thus, next we describe in more detail key figures who shaped the German community in the past decade.

back to top  Key HCI Researchers in Germany 2010–2020

The CHI community itself identifies members who "made a significant, cumulative contribution to the development of the field of HCI," selecting them into the ACM SIGCHI Academy. Among them, Elisabeth André (University of Augsburg), Patrick Baudisch (Hasso Plattner Institute), Albrecht Schmidt (LMU Munich), and Volker Wulf (University of Siegen) hold professorships at German universities. All four have contributed significantly to the development of the HCI research landscape within Germany and beyond.

Elisabeth André is an expert in multimodal machine interaction, tangible user interfaces, and embodied conversational agents. She publishes most prominently at venues such as IUI and ICMI. Her research has a significant influence on the HCI field in Germany and beyond. In 2017, she received the SIGCHI Academy award. Since 2001, she has held a professorship at the University of Augsburg, where she founded the chair of human-centered multimedia. Before, she was a principal researcher at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) in Saarbrücken, Germany.

At Hasso Plattner Institute (HPI), Patrick Baudisch built a group with a strong technical focus on natural user interfaces. His main publication outlets are CHI and UIST. Since 2013, he has been part of the SIGCHI Academy for his work on creating interactive devices that explore the nature of spatial interaction. Baudisch took over a professorship at HPI in 2008, where he is chair of the Human-Computer Interaction Lab. Before that, he worked as a research scientist at Microsoft Research and Xerox PARC and obtained his Ph.D. at Darmstadt University of Technology in Germany. His Ph.D. graduates (https://hpi.de/baudisch/people.html) hold faculty positions at Carnegie Mellon, the University of Chicago, ETH Zurich, and MIT.

Albrecht Schmidt actively started publishing at CHI in 2007. After getting his Ph.D. from Lancaster University, Schmidt was the head of the Embedded Interaction research group at LMU Munich. From 2006 to 2007 he held a shared position at the University of Bonn and the Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (IAIS). In 2007, Schmidt took over a professorship at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Before moving to LMU Munich, where he chairs the Human-Centered Ubiquitous Media group, he headed a group at the University of Stuttgart. He has had a significant impact on the German HCI research landscape, with his main publication outlets being CHI, MobileHCI, and UbiComp, as well as helping establish the AutomotiveUI conference series. Since 2018, Schmidt has been part of the SIGCHI Academy for his work on context-awareness and situated computing.

After finishing his Ph.D., Volker Wulf held multiple visiting professorships, including at the University of Hamburg and the University of Freiburg. He then went abroad for a research stay at MIT. Since 2004, he has held the chair of Information Systems and New Media at the University of Siegen. Also, he is director of the School of Media and Information (iSchool) at the University of Siegen and heads a research group at Fraunhofer FIT in Sankt Augustin. Wulf established the largest community of professors in Germany that are active at CHI in Siegen. In addition, he significantly influenced the European CSCW research landscape. He became part of the SIGCHI Academy in 2018 for his work conceptualizing a practice-based perspective to computer science and HCI.

Jan Borchers at RWTH Aachen University also stood out on our list. Looking at the number of published full papers at CHI, Borchers's long-term scientific impact in the past decade is comparable to that of the other leading researchers in the German SIGCHI community such as Schmidt and Baudisch. Borchers could be considered one of Germany's CHI pioneers, as he was one of the first German professors regularly publishing at CHI, contributing regularly from 2003 onward (his first paper was in 1997), for nearly two decades. After returning from a faculty position in Stanford, Borchers established the Media Informatics HCI research group at RWTH Aachen. Borchers' example shows that the German CHI community has been driven by "returnees" rather than developing homogeneously from different research streams (e.g., from engineering psychology, or AI).

In summary, HCI research in Germany developed rapidly between 2010 and 2020. Due to returnees from abroad, there was a push in the field around 2010, and many research groups have published an increasing amount of their research at CHI, the leading conference. Still, HCI research in Germany is quite engineering driven and mostly situated in computer science, also having different, unconnected thematic clusters throughout the country.

back to top  Conclusion and Outlook

The aim of this article was to discuss the evolution of the German research groups in the past decade that publish at (co-)sponsored SIGCHI conferences. We provided a quantitative overview of the research groups and professorships active at the leading HCI conference and described the role of five key figures in Germany. The German HCI community is quite small, not very diverse, and mainly situated in computer science. It was largely built up and shaped by international returnees and is technical in nature. In general, it appears to be difficult for non-German scientists to gain a permanent foothold in the German academic system. The German CHI community has a lot of potential to become more diverse and to anchor itself better in Germany's existing structures. The low proportion of women who regularly publish at CHI shows that there are still very strong barriers to gaining a foothold there. Table 1 (http://interactions.acm.org/uploads/CHI_in_Germany.xlsx) can also be used to examine in which other areas German HCI groups are actively publishing.

Similar attempts to capture the German HCI landscape exist. For example, Jan Borchers maintains a list of German groups actively publishing at CHI in the past 15 years (https://hci.rwth-aachen.de/chi-ranking). Many other groups are also working on HCI research topics in Germany and presenting at other conferences (nevertheless, there is a strong correlation between conferences such as CHI, IUI, and UIST, among others). We limited our view to those active at CHI and other SIGCHI conferences, as we think that this conference is the focal point for groundbreaking findings within the HCI research field. Many other conferences also produce new and valuable results, but CHI is often the focal point for many of these developments within HCI. Nevertheless, there are other large areas of human-centered computing research in Germany, most notably visualization research with its main conference IEEE VIS, but also the large local conference series "Mensch und Computer." In addition, other perspectives could reveal interesting insights into the German HCI community by, for example, looking at curriculum development, funded projects, or ERC research awards. Last but not least, it is of course the many bright Ph.D. students and postdocs who produce the research contributions and on whose shoulders the system rests.

We believe that in the next decade, the German HCI research community needs to strive to become more inclusive in all dimensions. Engaging more with existing subfields of computer science (e.g., AI, software engineering) while embracing the interdisciplinary nature of HCI could help stimulate and enrich the field. For instance, tandem professorships in other disciplines beyond computer science (e.g., design, health, media science, sociology) could help amplify the impact of the field as a whole. It could be useful for many computer science departments to hire professors who have a multidisciplinary background, with prior degrees outside of computing.

We want to repeat this exercise in 2030 to get evidence on how the field is evolving and also dissolving into other disciplines. In addition, we will post a comment to this article in 2022 to discuss trends and streams that we might not have captured here, and invite our colleagues to send us notes and comments on this article.

back to top  Acknowledgments

Big thanks to Jasmin Niess for iterating with me over this article and providing valuable input and comments. We would like to thank Eva Hornecker, Antonio Krüger, Rainer Malaka, Albrecht Schmidt, Michael Sedlmair, and Yvonne Rogers for providing valuable input for this article and Daria Soroko for helping us with the figures and tables.

back to top  References

1. Sturm, C. et al. How WEIRD is HCI? Extending HCI principles to other countries and cultures. Proc. of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2015.

2. Himmelsbach, J. et al. Do we care about diversity in human-computer interaction: A comprehensive content analysis on diversity dimensions in research. Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2019.

3. CHI is the top conference in HCI and one of the leading conferences in computer science According to Google Scholar it has an h-5 index average of 95 and an h-5 index median of 122, and, as of January 2020, is listed in the top 10 computer science conferences by https://www.guide2research.com. CHI is an annual research conference with around 3,000 international participants (https://chi.acm.org) hosted by SIGCHI. In addition to CHI, the SIGCHI community (co-) sponsors about 24 conferences on topics such as intelligent user interfaces, automotive user interfaces, and mobile human-computer interaction.

4. https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/2020/8675-20.html

5. http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/publ/papers/bibliometro.pdf

back to top  Author

Johannes Schöning is a professor of human-computer interaction (HCI) at the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland. Through his research, he wants to empower individuals and communities with the information they need to make better data-driven decisions by developing novel user interfaces with them. Johannes.schoening@unisg.ch

back to top 

Copyright held by author. Publication rights licensed to ACM.

The Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2022 ACM, Inc.

Post Comment


@Mark Albin (2012 06 30)

This is a very interesting article about social bots, thanks for sharing.

@Aman Anderson (2012 07 18)

This is great
“So what’s the center of a design? In one sense, it is the designer’s nuanced understanding of the problem or opportunity at hand. The focus of design is problem solving, not self-expression.” - Uday Gajendar, Interaction Designer

@Bill Killam (2012 07 31)

This is a long overdue article.  And I couldn’t agree with it more.  I’m current working on yet another Federal RFP that is asking for us to do work using short cut methods that are likely make it harder to get them quality results, and we can probably propose a cheaper and more data rich approach if they didn’t specify how we had to do the job.  Sad.

@Demosthenes Leonard Zelig (2012 08 12)

Great Article, it is funny to notice that such huge corporations do not even bother to do a market research before releasing products on a new market. However, I guess we are still learning from our mistakes.

@karla.arosemenea@gmail.com (2012 10 24)

Hi everyone, In the Technological University of Panama there is also a movement. There is a 2 years MS in IT with a specializtation in HCI. We are also trying to include HCI as part of our main curricula. This year we started a research with a company interested on incorporating usability in their development. We expect to receive a Fulbright Scholar next year in this area…

Regards,

Karla Arosemena
Professor

@John Michael Sheehan (2012 11 06)

There are thousands of blogs that requires comments on them. What is the intention of blog comments? Sent From Blackberry.

@Junia Anacleto (2012 11 07)

A very shallow and naive view of a much more rich and complex context.
I am still waiting for a fair position paper to be presented.

@Rick Norton (2012 11 17)

Excellent article raising significant issues that are largely overlooked.  The prospect that the collapse of sustainability for a growth/consumption related societal model is inevitable, is a topic I have often wondered about, given the nature of capitalism as we know it today.  Even the “Great Recession” of current times gives me pause to wonder just how long we can keep this economic engine going before we have to face the reality that we are all going to have to learn to “live with less”.  (A quantitative assessment, not necessarily qualitative.)

Keep up the good work.  Hopefully, you will raise awareness of these topics.

@Noah McNeely (2012 11 27)

Very nice article, that raises meaningful questions.  I actually think that the idea of sustainable products and sustainable product development is a bit of a myth.  All products consume energy and other resources in one form or another during their production, use, or re-use.  The key, ultimately is to balance resource consumption with resource production, but we will always need to be producing new resources.  See my blog post on the subject at ( http://productinnovationblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/are-there-sustainable-materials_7159.html )

@ed.h.chi@gmail.com (2012 11 30)

The quote in the article mis-contextualize James Landay ‘s essay. James actually is actively working to break down those stereotypes, but you can’t do that without understanding what the deep problems are.

James’ blog post on this is at
http://dubfuture.blogspot.com/2011/12/china-will-overtake-us-in.html

@Lee Crane (2012 12 03)

This is a topic that is thought provoking and important.  The message explores how humans can escape and survive the world they have jumbled.  So many of the theories and ideas are basic.  Our future may look a lot like the distant past.  And indeed we may be happier for it.

@ 4996484 (2012 12 19)

this is a great article David and Silvia!  I’‘m so excited that you guys wrote this up and are showing everyone the complexities in this space. I hope Interactions features more of this kind of research on China.  Although I agree w/ @landay’s assessment of China’s creativity problem - but he’s working with a very different population than you guys. I think you research is absolutely on point - creative folks are going to hacker spaces like Xinchejian, they aren’t ending up in institutions like Tsinghua!  I explain more here:  http://www.88-bar.com/2012/12/where-are-all-the-creative-chinese-people-hanging-out-in-hacker-spaces-apparently/

@Joe (2013 01 04)

I think that if you study the Elliot Wave Theory it can answer your questions.

@Rafeeque (2013 01 06)

good one

@zhai (2013 01 16)

Enjoyed reading this article. I finally got why Harold wants to call it “the Fitts law”. If enough people write it that way I would never have to correct another submission making the embarrassing mistake of ‘Fitt’s law”.

I did not completely get the following remark though:

        “The Accot and Zhai paper about the Fitts Law [3] has a clever title that illustrates
        the rules on letters, “More than dotting the i’s…”—a bad pun on eyes.”

I came up with the title, but the word “eyes” never came to my mind. We meant that the point-and-click style of UI is like dotting the i’s everywhere—- placing a click on constrained targets as the fundamental action in interaction. Why not using ” Crossing the t’s ”  as an alternative action?  Indeed, we presented models of a new style of UI, which systematically reveals when crossing is superior to clicking,  hence the subtitle of the paper “Foundations for crossing-based interfaces.”

Shumin Zhai

@Mohamadou M. Amar (2013 03 22)

I am a Doctoral student in I/O Psychology with Touro UW and need to access your articles.

@Mohamadou Amar (2013 03 22)

Need access for Doctoral Research

@William Hudson (2013 04 09)

Gilbert overlooks the important issue that the ‘big boys’ largely do not appreciate the need for design all and the problems that real people have with technology. I admit that we’ve had a hard time selling UCD but I am not persuaded by the arguments here to abandon it. Perhaps have a look at my article on a similar subject - User Requirements for the 21st Century - where I take a more pragmatic view of trying to address real users’ needs in the development process. http://bit.ly/agile-ucd

@ 0343665 (2013 04 29)

Fantastic text. I came here by searching for people that quote the Standford study on multitasking. The introduction is fantastic as it builds up an argument that attention has some features that do not change over time.

@Simon Taylor (2013 04 30)

not wanting to do anything so grandiose as building a (technology for) a world parliament, I have in essence been working on the same problems and facing the seven challenges with a project called ‘company.’ [https://gust.com/c/littleelephantltd]

In 2011, working with senior software developers - gratis - although neither the ethical undertaking nor the promise of sweat equity were enough to keep them involved - I established the technical feasibility of ‘company.’
h
In 2012, turning from the ‘voluntary’ ‘principled’ participation model - because the attractions of real paying jobs had lost me my team - I received financial support from the New Zealand government. This part-funded an Intellectual Property Position Review - which government considered a pre-requisite - as commercial due diligence - to investing in an initial build, or beta. The IPPR recommended I do proceed… However, government offers only part-funding and without a team - either technical or commercial - there has been little to no investor interest.

As things stand at present, I have the tools and schematics for a beta build of something which would fit the sort of use imagined here. If you have any interest in helping, please contact me.

Best,
Simon Taylor