The Challenge at the Interface

XV.3 May + June 2008
Page: 42
Digital Citation

LIFELONG INTERACTIONSDesigning online interactions


Authors:
Allison Druin

Last year I was invited to my child’s school to celebrate her birthday. When I walked into the classroom early, I was surrounded by 7- and 8-year-olds with stuffed animals in their hands, on their laps, and hanging from their shoulders. The children were sitting under tables, curled up in the book area, crawling by the math blocks, all with their stuffed animals. My daughter greeted me from the book area with, “Mom, you came in time for Webkinz School.” Since I knew this was not the name of her school, I was a bit confused. What I came to find out was that these children were actually “acting out” an online environment for children! During “free choice time,” and without prompting from their second-grade teacher, the children initiated dramatic play with their stuffed animals. This had started with just a few children, but had grown into a classroom-wide activity. Boys and girls were carrying their stuffed Webkinz everywhere they went.

Webkinz is a “convergent toy” and brainchild of Toronto-based Ganz. Children 6 to 13 years old access an online environment (www.webkinz.com) via a password that is provided through the purchase of a stuffed animal. At that time, my own child was not using Webkinz. However, she had decided she wanted to be a part of the fun, and so she brought in her own “regular” stuffed animals to Webkinz School. Later that year, she became an official Webkinz user, going online to see her plush animal in the form of a virtual pet. There she cared for her screen pet, furnished virtual rooms, and played games to win “KinzCash” to “buy” pieces for her room. Today, she has 10 Webkinz animals; she also has Webkinz trading cards and a Webkinz charm that lets her into special places in this world. Her collection is small in comparison to those of her friends, who have amassed a huge quantity of the animals, cards, and trinkets.

What has truly amazed me, both as a parent and as a researcher, is how loyal (or “sticky”) these children are to this online environment. According to Science and Strategy, “Between April 2006 and January 2007 kids spent an average of two hours per visit on Webkinz. YouTube, by contrast, averaged 32 minutes per visit during the same period… [1]”

How can we learn more about interaction design from these online environments for children? Webkinz is just one of these many new environments; others include Club Penguin (www.clubpenguin.com) and Shining Stars (www.shiningstars.com). Many of these worlds, such as Kookeys (www.kookeys.com) and Ty Girlz (www.tygirlz.com), have physical toys associated with their online experiences.

Webkinz has enjoyed a level of popularity that is unchallenged by these other environments. This toy was introduced first, and Ganz quickly moved its business model away from the traditional “software subscription” and into a gift and specialty market. There was essentially no traditional advertising, with the popularity spreading via word of mouth (keep in mind that those doing the “viral marketing” are six-year-old children). Had I not walked into that classroom last year, I would have never understood the power of children’s online environments. Webkinz was not virtual, but a real and integral part of the child’s whole day. According to the Ganz communication manager, Webkinz “...came from an examination of who kids are and what they like to do and how we can give them all of it in one experience. There are other toys with virtual components on the market, but our concept was to simultaneously offer a plush toy with a Web site, not to introduce a plush, then roll out a Web site [2].”

When I first read this article, I was curious how the company was able to understand children. How did they figure out what they liked and didn’t? I was curious about their brainstorming methods and design process. I didn’t get very far in finding out much from Ganz, and so I spent some time comparing the capabilities of Webkinz with the lessons learned with my team over the years. For the past three years, my team, with support from the National Science Foundation, developed an online community for children that encouraged their use of books and sharing stories [3, 4, 5]. In addition, I’ve spent time in my lab with children and Webkinz, watching the interaction patterns between children and between technology and children. Given these research experiences, I provide here a summary of what kids want, and what designers know.

Kids Want…

Stories. Children want to listen to stories, read them, experience them interactively, and to create their own. Stories can frame an abstract concept; stories can be a reason to collaborate; they can be a reason to be social; stories can be what engages reluctant learners; stories can enable creative expression and communication; and all of these findings are consistent with much of the storytelling literature in the field [6, 7, 8].

A relationship with characters in many forms. Today’s children move seamlessly between television, online environments, printed books, and stuffed animals, all because they have formed a relationship with Barney or Big Bird [9]. What has been a recent development is more tightly coupling these various forms, so that one can depend on another for passwords, viral outreach, changes/additions in content.

To be creators, not just consumers. Before there was Web 2.0, social networking, and IM, there was Logo, Basic, and SmallTalk. All of these programming languages helped researchers to understand how powerful it was to put tools in children’s hands, not just interactive textbooks [10]. Seymour Papert reminded researchers that constructivism (by way of Piaget) suggested that children can learn by constructing or creating their own paths to knowledge, and that computer tools could support children as builders, designers, and researchers [11].

Control. There are few times that children can control their world, without the rules of parents, teachers, or other adults. The reality of computer tools supporting children to exert more control of their experiences suggests new possibilities for learning, identity development, and social awareness [4, 12]. To watch a child placing a new piece of furniture in a virtual room is to experience the ultimate in control.

To collect. Children collect rocks, shells, stuffed animals, pictures, and stickers; the list is endless [13]. This desire to collect by children has not been lost on the creators of Webkinz. Pokeman, and NeoPets. Not only can you buy a stuffed animal for Webkinz, you can choose from any number of physical objects (including trading cards, charms, mouse pads, and lip gloss) that offer secret surprises.

Designers Know…

Limits on how much time kids can be in a specific activity. We need to leave kids wanting more. This is a design decision that permeates many interactions on today’s online communities for children. If you choose to play some games, you may get only one chance at it a day. The more important or precious an online interaction can feel, the more children will be drawn to it.

Limits to what children can say online. Thanks to government regulations, limiting what children can say within online chats or email can keep children safe from online bullies, predators, and scams. It can also keep designers of such sites out of court litigation.

The need for “green” design. Online environments need to always be growing and changing to keep kids coming back. This is the case with the objects as well. Without change and additions, children may feel that the site is stagnating, not as “cool,” and edging toward boring. The viral buzz about a site or toy can come only when users feel there is continual activity and maintenance of these resources.

There is still much to be learned from children and their online interactions and technologies. Can adult online communities benefit from the lessons of children? After 20 years in making new technologies for children, I’ve learned that children will make us work very, very hard: They may, ultimately, prove to be our toughest user group to please.

References

1. “Webkinz, the Bridge to Real and Virtual.” April 4, 2007. Science and Strategy. <http://www.science.nl/blog.php?categorie%5B5%5D=on&PHPSESSID=1873de0c57a8fcec3338e8c566e40bc1&taal=EN&PHPSESSID=1873de0c57a8fcec3338e8c566e40bc1%20>

2. Scott, Zan Dubin. “Webkinz Knows What Kids Want.” PlayZak Magazine. September 2006. <http://www.playzak.com/article.asp?id=2113>

3. Druin, A. “What Children Can Teach Us: Developing digital libraries for children.” Library Quarterly 75, no. 1 (2005): 20-41.

4. Hou, W., A. Komlodi, J. Preece, A. Druin, and E. Golub. “A Pilot Study of Supporting Children’s Online Identity Representation in International Communities.” Working paper, HCII’2007, Beijing, China, 2007.

5. Komlodi, A., W. Hou, J. Preece, A. Druin, E. Golub, J. Alburo, S. Liao, A. Elkiss, and P. Resnik. “Evaluating a Cross-cultural Children’s Online Book Community: Lessons learned for sociability, usability, and cultural exchange.” Interacting with Computers 19 no. 4 (2007): 494-511.

6. Baker-Sennett, J., E. Matusov, and B. Rogoff. “Sociocultural Processes Of Creative Planning in Children’s Playcrafting.” In Context and Cognition: Ways of Learning and Knowing. Edited by P. Light and G. Butterworth. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.

7. Nicolich, L. M. “Beyond Sensorimotor Intelligence: Assessment of symbolic maturity through analysis of pretend play.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 23 (1977): 89-99.

8. Sheldon, A. and L. Rohleder “Sharing the Same World, Telling Different Stories: Gender Differences in Co-Constructed Pretend Narratives.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Edited by D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, and J. Guo, 613-631. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.

9. Strommen, E. When the Interface is a Talking Dinosaur: Learning across media with Actimates Barney.” Proceedings of CHI ‘98. ACM Press, 1998, 288-295.

10. Solomon, C. Computer Environments for Children. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.

11. Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, 1980.

12. Resnick, M. “Technologies for Lifelong Kindergarten.” Educational Technology Research and Development 46 no. 4 (1998).

13. Martin, S., M. Brady, and R. Williams. “Effects of Toys on the Social Behavior of Preschool Children in Integrated and Nonintegrated Groups: Investigation of a setting event.” Journal of Early Intervention, 15 (1991):153-161.

Author

Allison Druin
University of Maryland
allisond@umiacs.umd.edu

EDITOR

Allison Druin
University of Maryland
allisond@umiacs.umd.edu

About the Author

Allison Druin is the director of the Human-Computer Interaction Lab (HCIL) and an associate professor in the College of Information Studies at the University of Maryland. For more than two decades, Druin has led interdisciplinary teams of adults and children to develop new technologies (e.g., digital libraries, mobile storytelling) to support children’s learning. She was the founder of CHIkids, a CHI conference program, which led to the development of her team’s co-design methods with children, Cooperative Inquiry.

Footnotes

DOI: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1353782.1353792

©2008 ACM  1072-5220/08/0500  $5.00

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee.

The Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright © 2008 ACM, Inc.

 

Post Comment


No Comments Found