David Cuartielles, Jonathan Bean, Daniela Rosner
In a column last year ("Making: Movement or Brand?" January - February 2014), we argued that the maker "revolution" may be best understood as a brand rather than a social movement. While proponents view makers as part of a new creative class that circumvents conventional mass consumption, we noted that many makers become good capitalists, too—selling books, tickets, and magazines as well as seeding new businesses. By adopting and enacting maker discourse, makers additionally become proponents of an ideological stance wherein small-scale design gets portrayed as a catalyst for social change. Finally, we pointed out that surprisingly few women…
You must be a member of SIGCHI, a subscriber to ACMís Digital Library, or an interactions subscriber to read the full text of this article.LOG IN TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE
GET ACCESSJoin ACM SIGCHI
In addition to all of the professional benefits of being a SIGCHI member, members get full access to interactionsí online content and receive the print version of the magazine bimonthly.
Subscribe to the ACM Digital Library
Get access to all interactions content online and the entire archive of ACM publications dating back to 1954. (Please check with your institution to see if it already has a subscription.)
Subscribe to interactions
Get full access to interactionsí online content and receive the print version of the magazine bimonthly.